
In this frank slideshow essay found in Slate Magazine, the author, Witold Rybczynski, argues that "the current vogue for prefabs is more about industrial chic than affordability." Many of the projects he cites are those made popular by magazines such as Dwell and furthermore they are touted as the "future of American housing" in The New Yorker. In the end, Rybcynski feels that modern prefab is another passing fad in architectural history and that the much cheaper, established, and traditional-looking modular and manufactured housing industry will continue to prevail as the option for those searching for affordable, new, single-family homes.
Slate Magazine: The Prefab FadI agree with several of the points that Rybczynski makes, many of them referenced from Colin Davie's book, "The Prefabricated Home". I think that much of the modern movement of prefab single-family homes is geared towards buyers who want a custom architect-designed home but cannot afford one. For those who are just looking for an affordable, well-designed dwelling they can call their own, modern prefab homes are still out of their price-range. For example, Rybczynski cites that although Rocio Romero's prefab kit-of-parts LV Home is listed as $31/sqft, that only includes the exterior shell. After all the interior necessities are added, such as plumbing and heating, the home comes out to more than $100/sqft. On the other hand, a conventional prefab panel home, also a kit-of-parts, comes out to less than $40/sqft when everything is included.
So what should be done? I think there is certainly a market for the modern prefab movement, but it will not make much of an impact for the everyday person searching for an affordable home. Instead, I think architects who want to make in impact in affordable housing through prefabrication need to look at how prefab technology can be applied to larger residential multi-family projects.
Images taken from Witold Rybczynski's slideshow essay at Slate.com